head to head · open source

Puter vs pki

Puter has 43,554 GitHub stars, 4,064 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pki has 509 stars, 162 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Puter leads on adoption by 8,457% (43,554 vs 509 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; pki is written in Java under GPL-2.0. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, pki 32%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K pki ★ 509 category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter pki
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 509
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 162
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick pki if

  • You want the pki feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and pki fits your workflow better

full pki profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About pki

Dogtag PKI is an enterprise class open source Certificate Authority suite, written in Java and licensed under GPL 2.0, for administrators who need to run their own certificate lifecycle infrastructure rather than buy it as a hosted service.

read the full pki overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills ★ 33K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs vault puter vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade puter vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs nextcloud mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs certificates Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Certipy Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or pki more popular?

Puter has 43,554 GitHub stars and pki has 509. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and pki free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pki under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and pki?

Puter is written in TypeScript and pki in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or pki?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,554 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pki if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.