head to head · open source

Keycloak vs Tirreno

Keycloak has 36,832 GitHub stars, 8,941 forks, 3,292 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Tirreno has 1,513 stars, 179 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Keycloak leads on adoption by 2,334% (36,832 vs 1,513 stars). Keycloak is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Tirreno is written in PHP under AGPL-3.0. Keycloak has attracted 24% as many forks as stars, Tirreno 12%. Keycloak was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Keycloak ★ 37K Tirreno ★ 1.5K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Keycloak Tirreno
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Java PHP
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-14
Forks ⑂ 8.9K ⑂ 179
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Keycloak if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Keycloak profile →

pick Tirreno if

  • You want the Tirreno feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Tirreno fits your workflow better

full Tirreno profile →

About Keycloak

Keycloak is an open source identity and access management server, written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, that adds authentication and access control to applications and services, and it is intended for teams and organisations that want to own their user store rather than rent one.

read the full Keycloak overview →

About Tirreno

Tirreno is an open source security framework written in PHP and backed by PostgreSQL under AGPL 3.0. It lives in the application security and fraud prevention ecosystem, where it runs as a self hosted web application. The project describes itself as a few dependency, hand written application that can be installed quickly and used to ingest product events through API calls.

read the full Tirreno overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik keycloak vs supertokens keycloak vs zitadel puter vs tirreno mattermost vs tirreno tailscale vs tirreno keycloak vs marble keycloak vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs tracecat jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik puter vs marble mattermost vs marble tailscale vs marble puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Keycloak vs JumpServer Keycloak vs Better Auth Keycloak vs Authentik Keycloak vs SuperTokens Keycloak vs Zitadel Keycloak vs Logto Keycloak vs Ory Keycloak vs Hexclave Keycloak vs Permify Keycloak vs Authgear

Frequently asked questions

Is Keycloak or Tirreno more popular?

Keycloak has 36,832 GitHub stars and Tirreno has 1,513. Keycloak has the larger community by that measure.

Are Keycloak and Tirreno free?

Both are open source. Keycloak is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Tirreno under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Keycloak and Tirreno?

Keycloak is written in Java and Tirreno in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Keycloak or Tirreno?

Choose Keycloak if you want the larger community (36,832 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Tirreno if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.