head to head · open source

Puter vs Keyshade

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars, 4,062 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Keyshade has 768 stars, 263 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Puter leads on adoption by 5,571% (43,557 vs 768 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Keyshade is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Keyshade 34%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (good-first-issue, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Puter ★ 44K Keyshade ★ 768 category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Puter Keyshade
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 768
License AGPL-3.0 MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-04-08
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 263
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Puter if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Puter profile →

pick Keyshade if

  • You want the Keyshade feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Keyshade fits your workflow better

full Keyshade profile →

About Puter

Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.

read the full Puter overview →

About Keyshade

Keyshade is an open source secret and configuration management tool that encrypts secrets with public key cryptography and pushes them to application runtimes in real time, built in TypeScript for teams that currently keep configuration in a cloud provider's dashboard.

read the full Keyshade overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault puter vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat puter vs tirreno puter vs marble mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente mattermost vs vault mattermost vs unkey vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Puter vs Mattermost Puter vs Signal Puter vs Ente Puter vs Element Puter vs Fluxer Puter vs Tuta Puter vs Zen Puter vs Cinny Puter vs Stoat Puter vs Quiet Puter vs Wire Puter vs Peergos

Frequently asked questions

Is Puter or Keyshade more popular?

Puter has 43,557 GitHub stars and Keyshade has 768. Puter has the larger community by that measure.

Are Puter and Keyshade free?

Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Keyshade under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Puter and Keyshade?

Puter is written in TypeScript and Keyshade in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Puter or Keyshade?

Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,557 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Keyshade if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.