head to head · open source
Puter vs ejbca-ce
Puter has 44,088 GitHub stars, 4,141 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ejbca-ce has 967 stars, 166 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Puter leads on adoption by 4,459% (44,088 vs 967 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; ejbca-ce is written in Java under LGPL-2.1. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, ejbca-ce 17%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Puter | ejbca-ce | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 44K | ★ 967 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-2.1 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.1K | ⑂ 166 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Puter if
- You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ejbca-ce if
- You want the ejbca-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and ejbca-ce fits your workflow better
About Puter
The Open Source Internet Computer! « LIVE DEMO » Puter.com · App Store · Developers · X Puter Puter is an advanced, open source, self hostable internet computer designed to be feature rich, fast, and highly extensible. For Users Puter's goal is to provide you with every app and feature you need to work, create, and play under one roof. From a simple Notepad and Voice Recorder to Spreadsheet and Camera, Puter wants to be the all in one solution for your digital life. For Developers Puter provides everything you need to build and publish web apps and games. From AI to Cloud Storage and Database to Serverless…
read the full Puter overview →
About ejbca-ce
EJBCA Community Note: We take the security of EJBCA and the trust of our users seriously. If you believe you have identified a security vulnerability in EJBCA, please report it responsibly by contacting us at security@primekey.com. EJBCA Community Edition is not intended for production use. For PKI production deployments, use Keyfactor EJBCA Enterprise Edition. Welcome to the EJBCA Community EJBCA is a public key infrastructure (PKI) and certificate authority (CA) solution and one of the longest running CA software projects. It is platform independent and covers the full certificate lifecycle, from enrollment…
read the full ejbca-ce overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Data Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Puter or ejbca-ce more popular?
Puter has 44,088 GitHub stars and ejbca-ce has 967. Puter has the larger community by that measure.
Are Puter and ejbca-ce free?
Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ejbca-ce under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Puter and ejbca-ce?
Puter is written in TypeScript and ejbca-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Puter or ejbca-ce?
Choose Puter if you want the larger community (44,088 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ejbca-ce if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.