head to head · open source
Puter vs ejbca-ce
Puter has 43,565 GitHub stars, 4,066 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped today. ejbca-ce has 952 stars, 160 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Puter leads on adoption by 4,476% (43,565 vs 952 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; ejbca-ce is written in Java under LGPL-2.1. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, ejbca-ce 17%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Puter | ejbca-ce | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 44K | ★ 952 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | LGPL-2.1 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-09-20 | 2026-09-15 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.1K | ⑂ 160 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Puter if
- You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ejbca-ce if
- You want the ejbca-ce feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and ejbca-ce fits your workflow better
About Puter
Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.
read the full Puter overview →
About ejbca-ce
EJBCA Community Edition is an LGPL licensed, Java based public key infrastructure and certificate authority package for anyone who wants to learn, test, or prototype certificate and PKI workflows without committing to a commercial PKI product.
read the full ejbca-ce overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Data Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Puter or ejbca-ce more popular?
Puter has 43,565 GitHub stars and ejbca-ce has 952. Puter has the larger community by that measure.
Are Puter and ejbca-ce free?
Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ejbca-ce under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Puter and ejbca-ce?
Puter is written in TypeScript and ejbca-ce in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Puter or ejbca-ce?
Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,565 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ejbca-ce if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.