head to head · open source
Puter vs AutomatedLab
Puter has 43,550 GitHub stars, 4,064 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AutomatedLab has 2,226 stars, 383 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Puter leads on adoption by 1,856% (43,550 vs 2,226 stars). Puter is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; AutomatedLab is written in PowerShell under MIT. Puter has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, AutomatedLab 17%. Puter was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 15422 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Puter | AutomatedLab | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 44K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | PowerShell |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-07-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.1K | ⑂ 383 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Puter if
- You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick AutomatedLab if
- You want the AutomatedLab feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches PowerShell
- You evaluated both and AutomatedLab fits your workflow better
About Puter
Puter is an open source, self hostable internet computer that delivers a full desktop environment running directly in a web browser. It functions as a cloud based operating system, integrating file storage, applications, and developer tooling into a single cohesive platform. The project lives in the browser based desktop and cloud infrastructure ecosystem, positioning itself as a free and open alternative to proprietary cloud desktop services.
read the full Puter overview →
About AutomatedLab
AutomatedLab is an MIT licensed PowerShell provisioning framework that deploys complex lab environments — Windows domain controllers, Exchange, PKI, IIS and Linux guests — on Hyper V or Azure from simple scripts, built for IT admins, testers and trainers who need full multi VM labs on demand.
read the full AutomatedLab overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Data Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Puter or AutomatedLab more popular?
Puter has 43,550 GitHub stars and AutomatedLab has 2,226. Puter has the larger community by that measure.
Are Puter and AutomatedLab free?
Both are open source. Puter is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and AutomatedLab under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Puter and AutomatedLab?
Puter is written in TypeScript and AutomatedLab in PowerShell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Puter or AutomatedLab?
Choose Puter if you want the larger community (43,550 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose AutomatedLab if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.