head to head · open source

gitleaks vs puppetry

gitleaks has 29,396 GitHub stars, 2,236 forks, 481 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. puppetry has 888 stars, 127 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. gitleaks leads on adoption by 3,210% (29,396 vs 888 stars). gitleaks is written in Go under MIT; puppetry is written in JavaScript under MIT. gitleaks has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, puppetry 14%. gitleaks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ci-cd), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gitleaks ★ 29K puppetry ★ 888 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

gitleaks puppetry
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 888
License MIT MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-06-19
Forks ⑂ 2.2K ⑂ 127
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gitleaks if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gitleaks profile →

pick puppetry if

  • You want the puppetry feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and puppetry fits your workflow better

full puppetry profile →

About gitleaks

Gitleaks is an MIT licensed, Go based command line tool that detects hardcoded secrets such as passwords, API keys, and tokens in git repositories, files, and standard input, and it serves developers and security teams that need to keep credentials out of source control.

read the full gitleaks overview →

About puppetry

Puppetry is a no code/low code end to end web testing tool built on top of Puppeteer and Jest, aimed at QA engineers, testers, and developers who want to record and manage browser tests through a UI instead of writing scripts — though the project is now officially deprecated and kept only as an example and a piece of its own history.

read the full puppetry overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

ansible vs gitleaks n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

gitleaks vs ansible gitleaks vs compose gitleaks vs conductor gitleaks vs xxl-job gitleaks vs Kestra gitleaks vs haystack gitleaks vs rancher gitleaks vs Prefect gitleaks vs Archon gitleaks vs Temporal gitleaks vs rowboat gitleaks vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is gitleaks or puppetry more popular?

gitleaks has 29,396 GitHub stars and puppetry has 888. gitleaks has the larger community by that measure.

Are gitleaks and puppetry free?

Both are open source. gitleaks is licensed under MIT and puppetry under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gitleaks and puppetry?

gitleaks is written in Go and puppetry in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gitleaks or puppetry?

Choose gitleaks if you want the larger community (29,396 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose puppetry if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.