head to head · open source

puppeteer vs profiler

puppeteer has 95,671 GitHub stars, 9,587 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped yesterday. profiler has 1,536 stars, 496 forks, 862 open issues and last shipped yesterday. puppeteer leads on adoption by 6,129% (95,671 vs 1,536 stars). puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; profiler is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. puppeteer has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, profiler 32%. profiler was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (firefox), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puppeteer ★ 96K profiler ★ 1.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

puppeteer profiler
GitHub stars ★ 96K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 9.6K ⑂ 496
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puppeteer if

  • You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puppeteer profile →

pick profiler if

  • You want the profiler feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and profiler fits your workflow better

full profiler profile →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

About profiler

Firefox Profiler is an open source web application for visualizing performance profiles recorded from Firefox and other profilers, built for developers and Mozilla engineers who need to diagnose slow pages, scripts, and browser behaviour.

read the full profiler overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 275K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

puppeteer vs ECC puppeteer vs react puppeteer vs Langflow puppeteer vs Supabase puppeteer vs archify puppeteer vs PocketBase puppeteer vs i-have-adhd puppeteer vs codebase-memory-mcp puppeteer vs herdr puppeteer vs ToolJet puppeteer vs AppSmith puppeteer vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is puppeteer or profiler more popular?

puppeteer has 95,671 GitHub stars and profiler has 1,536. puppeteer has the larger community by that measure.

Are puppeteer and profiler free?

Both are open source. puppeteer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and profiler under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between puppeteer and profiler?

puppeteer is written in TypeScript and profiler in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puppeteer or profiler?

Choose puppeteer if you want the larger community (95,671 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose profiler if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.