head to head · open source

puppeteer vs archify

puppeteer has 95,590 GitHub stars, 9,576 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped yesterday. archify has 66,725 stars, 4,451 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped yesterday. puppeteer leads on adoption by 43% (95,590 vs 66,725 stars). puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; archify is written in JavaScript under MIT. puppeteer has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, archify 7%. archify was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puppeteer ★ 96K archify ★ 67K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

puppeteer archify
GitHub stars ★ 96K ★ 67K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 9.6K ⑂ 4.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puppeteer if

  • You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puppeteer profile →

pick archify if

  • You want the archify feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and archify fits your workflow better

full archify profile →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

About archify

Archify is an MIT licensed agent skill and Node.js rendering and validation system that turns a codebase or a written system description into a polished, interactive, self contained HTML system map, and it is built for developers and platform teams working inside coding agents such as Cursor, Claude Code, Codex CLI, and OpenCode.

read the full archify overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

puppeteer vs ECC puppeteer vs react puppeteer vs Langflow puppeteer vs Supabase puppeteer vs PocketBase puppeteer vs ToolJet puppeteer vs AppSmith puppeteer vs it-tools puppeteer vs herdr puppeteer vs lapce puppeteer vs TipTap puppeteer vs Directus

Frequently asked questions

Is puppeteer or archify more popular?

puppeteer has 95,590 GitHub stars and archify has 66,725. puppeteer has the larger community by that measure.

Are puppeteer and archify free?

Both are open source. puppeteer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and archify under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between puppeteer and archify?

puppeteer is written in TypeScript and archify in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puppeteer or archify?

Choose puppeteer if you want the larger community (95,590 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose archify if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.