head to head · open source

puppeteer vs AppSmith

puppeteer has 95,590 GitHub stars, 9,576 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped yesterday. AppSmith has 40,898 stars, 4,761 forks, 4,467 open issues and last shipped yesterday. puppeteer leads on adoption by 134% (95,590 vs 40,898 stars). puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; AppSmith is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. puppeteer has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, AppSmith 12%. AppSmith was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (automation, developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puppeteer ★ 96K AppSmith ★ 41K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

puppeteer AppSmith
GitHub stars ★ 96K ★ 41K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 9.6K ⑂ 4.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puppeteer if

  • You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puppeteer profile →

pick AppSmith if

  • You want the AppSmith feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and AppSmith fits your workflow better

full AppSmith profile →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

About AppSmith

Appsmith is an open source, Apache 2.0 low code platform written primarily in TypeScript that lets teams build custom internal tools such as admin panels, dashboards, and CRUD applications on top of their own databases and APIs.

read the full AppSmith overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

react vs appsmith openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

puppeteer vs ECC puppeteer vs react puppeteer vs Langflow puppeteer vs Supabase puppeteer vs archify puppeteer vs PocketBase puppeteer vs ToolJet puppeteer vs it-tools puppeteer vs herdr puppeteer vs lapce puppeteer vs TipTap puppeteer vs Directus

Frequently asked questions

Is puppeteer or AppSmith more popular?

puppeteer has 95,590 GitHub stars and AppSmith has 40,898. puppeteer has the larger community by that measure.

Are puppeteer and AppSmith free?

Both are open source. puppeteer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and AppSmith under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between puppeteer and AppSmith?

puppeteer is written in TypeScript and AppSmith in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puppeteer or AppSmith?

Choose puppeteer if you want the larger community (95,590 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose AppSmith if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.