head to head · open source

puppeteer vs Chartbrew

puppeteer has 95,591 GitHub stars, 9,579 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped today. Chartbrew has 4,061 stars, 455 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped today. puppeteer leads on adoption by 2,254% (95,591 vs 4,061 stars). puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Chartbrew is written in JavaScript under a custom or non-standard licence. puppeteer has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Chartbrew 11%. Chartbrew was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puppeteer ★ 96K Chartbrew ★ 4.1K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

puppeteer Chartbrew
GitHub stars ★ 96K ★ 4.1K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 9.6K ⑂ 455
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puppeteer if

  • You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puppeteer profile →

pick Chartbrew if

  • You want the Chartbrew feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Chartbrew fits your workflow better

full Chartbrew profile →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

About Chartbrew

Chartbrew is an open source web application for building and sharing live data dashboards. It sits in the JavaScript developer tools ecosystem and connects directly to APIs, SQL databases, and NoSQL databases so users can turn query results and request responses into charts. The project provides a chart builder, editable dashboards, embeddable charts, a query and request editor, team capabilities, scheduling, and an AI assistant.

read the full Chartbrew overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

puppeteer vs ECC puppeteer vs react puppeteer vs Langflow puppeteer vs Supabase puppeteer vs archify puppeteer vs PocketBase puppeteer vs i-have-adhd puppeteer vs codebase-memory-mcp puppeteer vs ToolJet puppeteer vs AppSmith puppeteer vs it-tools puppeteer vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is puppeteer or Chartbrew more popular?

puppeteer has 95,591 GitHub stars and Chartbrew has 4,061. puppeteer has the larger community by that measure.

Are puppeteer and Chartbrew free?

Both are open source. puppeteer is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Chartbrew has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between puppeteer and Chartbrew?

puppeteer is written in TypeScript and Chartbrew in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puppeteer or Chartbrew?

Choose puppeteer if you want the larger community (95,591 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Chartbrew if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.