head to head · open source

puppeteer vs ccs

puppeteer has 95,590 GitHub stars, 9,576 forks, 259 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ccs has 2,856 stars, 260 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. puppeteer leads on adoption by 3,247% (95,590 vs 2,856 stars). puppeteer is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; ccs is written in TypeScript under MIT. puppeteer has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, ccs 9%. puppeteer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

puppeteer ★ 96K ccs ★ 2.9K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

puppeteer ccs
GitHub stars ★ 96K ★ 2.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 9.6K ⑂ 260
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick puppeteer if

  • You weight community size — 96K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full puppeteer profile →

pick ccs if

  • You want the ccs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and ccs fits your workflow better

full ccs profile →

About puppeteer

Puppeteer is an Apache 2.0 JavaScript and TypeScript library that provides a high level API for driving Chrome and Firefox over the DevTools Protocol or WebDriver BiDi, written for developers who automate browsers from Node.js.

read the full puppeteer overview →

About ccs

CCS is an MIT licensed TypeScript CLI that switches Claude Code and compatible CLI runtimes between multiple Claude accounts, OAuth providers such as Codex and xAI/Grok, and OpenAI compatible or local model endpoints through one stable ccs command surface, aimed at developers who hold several AI coding subscriptions or model providers at once.

read the full ccs overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 262K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

puppeteer vs ECC puppeteer vs react puppeteer vs Langflow puppeteer vs Supabase puppeteer vs archify puppeteer vs PocketBase puppeteer vs ToolJet puppeteer vs AppSmith puppeteer vs it-tools puppeteer vs herdr puppeteer vs lapce puppeteer vs TipTap

Frequently asked questions

Is puppeteer or ccs more popular?

puppeteer has 95,590 GitHub stars and ccs has 2,856. puppeteer has the larger community by that measure.

Are puppeteer and ccs free?

Both are open source. puppeteer is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ccs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between puppeteer and ccs?

puppeteer is written in TypeScript and ccs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, puppeteer or ccs?

Choose puppeteer if you want the larger community (95,590 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ccs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.