head to head · open source

Pulumi vs laravel-backup

Pulumi has 25,695 GitHub stars, 1,431 forks, 2,419 open issues and last shipped today. laravel-backup has 6,026 stars, 784 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Pulumi leads on adoption by 326% (25,695 vs 6,026 stars). Pulumi is written in Go under Apache-2.0; laravel-backup is written in PHP under MIT. Pulumi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, laravel-backup 13%. Pulumi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Pulumi ★ 26K laravel-backup ★ 6.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Pulumi laravel-backup
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 6.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go PHP
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 784
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Pulumi if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Pulumi profile →

pick laravel-backup if

  • You want the laravel-backup feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and laravel-backup fits your workflow better

full laravel-backup profile →

About Pulumi

Pulumi is an open source infrastructure as code tool that lets teams define and deploy cloud infrastructure using general purpose programming languages instead of YAML, aimed at developers, platform engineers, and agents working across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and Kubernetes.

read the full Pulumi overview →

About laravel-backup

laravel backup is an MIT licensed PHP package from Spatie that packages a Laravel application's files and its database dump into a single zip archive and stores that archive on any filesystem Laravel is configured to use, and it is aimed at Laravel developers and operations teams who want automated, verifiable, self hosted backups without a separate backup service.

read the full laravel-backup overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs pulumi kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Pulumi vs kong Pulumi vs trivy Pulumi vs OpenTofu Pulumi vs jenkins Pulumi vs floci Pulumi vs argo-cd Pulumi vs sops Pulumi vs wtf Pulumi vs dagger Pulumi vs task Pulumi vs aws-cdk Pulumi vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is Pulumi or laravel-backup more popular?

Pulumi has 25,695 GitHub stars and laravel-backup has 6,026. Pulumi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Pulumi and laravel-backup free?

Both are open source. Pulumi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and laravel-backup under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Pulumi and laravel-backup?

Pulumi is written in Go and laravel-backup in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Pulumi or laravel-backup?

Choose Pulumi if you want the larger community (25,695 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose laravel-backup if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.