head to head · open source

Pulumi vs infracost

Pulumi has 25,694 GitHub stars, 1,431 forks, 2,419 open issues and last shipped yesterday. infracost has 12,521 stars, 688 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Pulumi leads on adoption by 105% (25,694 vs 12,521 stars). Pulumi is written in Go under Apache-2.0; infracost is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Pulumi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, infracost 5%. Pulumi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (aws, azure, cloud, gcp), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Pulumi ★ 26K infracost ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Pulumi infracost
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 688
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Pulumi if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Pulumi profile →

pick infracost if

  • You want the infracost feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and infracost fits your workflow better

full infracost profile →

About Pulumi

Pulumi is an open source infrastructure as code tool that lets teams define and deploy cloud infrastructure using general purpose programming languages instead of YAML, aimed at developers, platform engineers, and agents working across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and Kubernetes.

read the full Pulumi overview →

About infracost

Infracost is an open source cloud cost intelligence tool, written in Go and licensed Apache 2.0, that estimates cloud spend and enforces FinOps policies for Terraform, Terragrunt, CloudFormation and AWS CDK before changes are deployed — built for engineers, platform and DevOps teams, FinOps practitioners, and AI coding agents.

read the full infracost overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs pulumi kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Pulumi vs kong Pulumi vs trivy Pulumi vs OpenTofu Pulumi vs jenkins Pulumi vs floci Pulumi vs argo-cd Pulumi vs sops Pulumi vs wtf Pulumi vs dagger Pulumi vs task Pulumi vs aws-cdk Pulumi vs webhook

Frequently asked questions

Is Pulumi or infracost more popular?

Pulumi has 25,694 GitHub stars and infracost has 12,521. Pulumi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Pulumi and infracost free?

Both are open source. Pulumi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and infracost under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Pulumi and infracost?

Pulumi is written in Go and infracost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Pulumi or infracost?

Choose Pulumi if you want the larger community (25,694 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose infracost if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.