head to head · open source

Pulumi vs eNMS

Pulumi has 25,695 GitHub stars, 1,431 forks, 2,419 open issues and last shipped today. eNMS has 842 stars, 160 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Pulumi leads on adoption by 2,952% (25,695 vs 842 stars). Pulumi is written in Go under Apache-2.0; eNMS is written in Python under GPL-3.0. Pulumi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, eNMS 19%. Pulumi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Pulumi ★ 26K eNMS ★ 842 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Pulumi eNMS
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 842
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-05-08
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 160
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Pulumi if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Pulumi profile →

pick eNMS if

  • You want the eNMS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and eNMS fits your workflow better

full eNMS profile →

About Pulumi

Pulumi is an open source infrastructure as code tool that lets teams define and deploy cloud infrastructure using general purpose programming languages instead of YAML, aimed at developers, platform engineers, and agents working across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and Kubernetes.

read the full Pulumi overview →

About eNMS

eNMS An enterprise grade vendor agnostic network automation platform. Introduction eNMS is a vendor agnostic NMS designed for building workflow based network automation solutions. It encompasses the following aspects of network automation: Configuration Management Service : Backup with Git, change and rollback of configurations. Validation Services : Validate data about the state of a device with Netmiko and NAPALM. Ansible Service : Store and run Ansible playbooks. REST Service : Send REST calls with variable URL and payload. Python Script Service : Any python script can be integrated into the web UI. eNMS will …

read the full eNMS overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs pulumi kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Pulumi vs kong Pulumi vs trivy Pulumi vs OpenTofu Pulumi vs jenkins Pulumi vs floci Pulumi vs argo-cd Pulumi vs sops Pulumi vs wtf Pulumi vs dagger Pulumi vs task Pulumi vs aws-cdk Pulumi vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is Pulumi or eNMS more popular?

Pulumi has 25,695 GitHub stars and eNMS has 842. Pulumi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Pulumi and eNMS free?

Both are open source. Pulumi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and eNMS under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Pulumi and eNMS?

Pulumi is written in Go and eNMS in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Pulumi or eNMS?

Choose Pulumi if you want the larger community (25,695 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose eNMS if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.