head to head · open source

Pulumi vs cds

Pulumi has 25,695 GitHub stars, 1,431 forks, 2,419 open issues and last shipped today. cds has 4,843 stars, 453 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pulumi leads on adoption by 431% (25,695 vs 4,843 stars). Pulumi is written in Go under Apache-2.0; cds is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. Pulumi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, cds 9%. Pulumi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Pulumi ★ 26K cds ★ 4.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Pulumi cds
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 4.8K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 453
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Pulumi if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Pulumi profile →

pick cds if

  • You want the cds feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cds fits your workflow better

full cds profile →

About Pulumi

Pulumi is an open source infrastructure as code tool that lets teams define and deploy cloud infrastructure using general purpose programming languages instead of YAML, aimed at developers, platform engineers, and agents working across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and Kubernetes.

read the full Pulumi overview →

About cds

CDS is an open source, enterprise grade continuous delivery and DevOps automation platform written in Go, for teams that build, run and own their own CI/CD workflows and want to script and scale them without depending on a hosted vendor.

read the full cds overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs pulumi kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Pulumi vs kong Pulumi vs trivy Pulumi vs OpenTofu Pulumi vs jenkins Pulumi vs floci Pulumi vs argo-cd Pulumi vs sops Pulumi vs wtf Pulumi vs dagger Pulumi vs task Pulumi vs aws-cdk Pulumi vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is Pulumi or cds more popular?

Pulumi has 25,695 GitHub stars and cds has 4,843. Pulumi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Pulumi and cds free?

Both are open source. Pulumi is licensed under Apache-2.0 and cds under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Pulumi and cds?

Pulumi is written in Go and cds in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Pulumi or cds?

Choose Pulumi if you want the larger community (25,695 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose cds if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.