head to head · open source

ProxmoxVE vs loopx

ProxmoxVE has 29,607 GitHub stars, 2,887 forks, 27 open issues and last shipped yesterday. loopx has 5,890 stars, 554 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ProxmoxVE leads on adoption by 403% (29,607 vs 5,890 stars). ProxmoxVE is written in Shell under MIT; loopx is written in Python under Apache-2.0. ProxmoxVE has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, loopx 9%. loopx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ProxmoxVE ★ 30K loopx ★ 5.9K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

ProxmoxVE loopx
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 5.9K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Shell Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 554
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ProxmoxVE if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ProxmoxVE profile →

pick loopx if

  • You want the loopx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and loopx fits your workflow better

full loopx profile →

About ProxmoxVE

Proxmox VE Helper Scripts (Community Edition) is a collection of Shell scripts that install and configure self hosted services as containers or virtual machines on Proxmox VE. It is a community project built on the foundation of @tteck's original work, distributed under the MIT license, and it lives in the Proxmox VE and homelab ecosystem alongside LXC, Docker, Debian, Ubuntu, and Alpine tooling. The scripts cover hundreds of services across home automation, media, networking, monitoring, databases, security, and developer tooling.

read the full ProxmoxVE overview →

About loopx

LoopX is an open, provider neutral, local first control plane for long horizon AI agents that preserves objectives, gates, todos, evidence, quota, and handoffs across turns for developers and teams running durable, governed work on harnesses such as Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor.

read the full loopx overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

ProxmoxVE vs n8n ProxmoxVE vs Browser Use ProxmoxVE vs frigate ProxmoxVE vs Lightpanda ProxmoxVE vs ActivePieces ProxmoxVE vs Skyvern ProxmoxVE vs Automa ProxmoxVE vs LiveKit ProxmoxVE vs amis ProxmoxVE vs Windmill ProxmoxVE vs Botpress ProxmoxVE vs mitosis

Frequently asked questions

Is ProxmoxVE or loopx more popular?

ProxmoxVE has 29,607 GitHub stars and loopx has 5,890. ProxmoxVE has the larger community by that measure.

Are ProxmoxVE and loopx free?

Both are open source. ProxmoxVE is licensed under MIT and loopx under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ProxmoxVE and loopx?

ProxmoxVE is written in Shell and loopx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ProxmoxVE or loopx?

Choose ProxmoxVE if you want the larger community (29,607 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose loopx if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.