head to head · open source

Prometheus vs JSqlParser

Prometheus has 66,109 GitHub stars, 10,839 forks, 890 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. JSqlParser has 5,964 stars, 1,430 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Prometheus leads on adoption by 1,008% (66,109 vs 5,964 stars). Prometheus is written in Go under Apache-2.0; JSqlParser is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Prometheus has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, JSqlParser 24%. Prometheus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Prometheus ★ 66K JSqlParser ★ 6.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Prometheus JSqlParser
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 6.0K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Prometheus if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Prometheus profile →

pick JSqlParser if

  • You want the JSqlParser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and JSqlParser fits your workflow better

full JSqlParser profile →

About Prometheus

Prometheus is an open source monitoring system and time series database, part of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation ecosystem. It collects metrics from configured targets at defined intervals, evaluates alerting rules, and visualizes results. Designed for reliability in dynamic environments, it operates without reliance on distributed storage, ensuring each server node functions independently.

read the full Prometheus overview →

About JSqlParser

JSqlParser is an Apache 2.0 Java library that turns any SQL statement into a traversable hierarchy of Java classes and back again, aimed at JVM developers who need to read, analyse, rewrite, or generate SQL as data rather than execute it.

read the full JSqlParser overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs prometheus prometheus vs nocodb uptime-kuma vs prometheus supabase vs nocodb mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Prometheus vs mall Prometheus vs NocoDB Prometheus vs etcd Prometheus vs DBeaver Prometheus vs orm Prometheus vs Milvus Prometheus vs TiDB Prometheus vs drawDB Prometheus vs typeorm Prometheus vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager Prometheus vs Qdrant Prometheus vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is Prometheus or JSqlParser more popular?

Prometheus has 66,109 GitHub stars and JSqlParser has 5,964. Prometheus has the larger community by that measure.

Are Prometheus and JSqlParser free?

Both are open source. Prometheus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and JSqlParser under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Prometheus and JSqlParser?

Prometheus is written in Go and JSqlParser in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Prometheus or JSqlParser?

Choose Prometheus if you want the larger community (66,109 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose JSqlParser if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.