head to head · open source

Prometheus vs cassandra

Prometheus has 66,109 GitHub stars, 10,839 forks, 890 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cassandra has 10,096 stars, 4,118 forks, 529 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Prometheus leads on adoption by 555% (66,109 vs 10,096 stars). Prometheus is written in Go under Apache-2.0; cassandra is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Prometheus has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, cassandra 41%. cassandra was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Prometheus ★ 66K cassandra ★ 10K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Prometheus cassandra
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 10K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 4.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Prometheus if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Prometheus profile →

pick cassandra if

  • You want the cassandra feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and cassandra fits your workflow better

full cassandra profile →

About Prometheus

Prometheus is an open source monitoring system and time series database, part of the Cloud Native Computing Foundation ecosystem. It collects metrics from configured targets at defined intervals, evaluates alerting rules, and visualizes results. Designed for reliability in dynamic environments, it operates without reliance on distributed storage, ensuring each server node functions independently.

read the full Prometheus overview →

About cassandra

Apache Cassandra is an open source transactional distributed database written in Java and licensed under Apache 2.0, for users who need linear scalability and proven fault tolerance on commodity hardware or cloud infrastructure without compromising performance.

read the full cassandra overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

mall vs prometheus prometheus vs nocodb uptime-kuma vs prometheus supabase vs nocodb mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

Prometheus vs mall Prometheus vs NocoDB Prometheus vs etcd Prometheus vs DBeaver Prometheus vs orm Prometheus vs Milvus Prometheus vs TiDB Prometheus vs drawDB Prometheus vs typeorm Prometheus vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager Prometheus vs Qdrant Prometheus vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is Prometheus or cassandra more popular?

Prometheus has 66,109 GitHub stars and cassandra has 10,096. Prometheus has the larger community by that measure.

Are Prometheus and cassandra free?

Both are open source. Prometheus is licensed under Apache-2.0 and cassandra under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Prometheus and cassandra?

Prometheus is written in Go and cassandra in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Prometheus or cassandra?

Choose Prometheus if you want the larger community (66,109 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose cassandra if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.