head to head · open source

ranger vs projectsend

ranger has 17,418 GitHub stars, 940 forks, 896 open issues and last shipped 29 days ago. projectsend has 2,027 stars, 360 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ranger leads on adoption by 759% (17,418 vs 2,027 stars). ranger is written in Python under GPL-3.0; projectsend is written in PHP under GPL-2.0. ranger has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, projectsend 18%. projectsend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ranger ★ 17K projectsend ★ 2.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ranger projectsend
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 2.0K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Python PHP
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-10-07
Forks ⑂ 940 ⑂ 360
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ranger if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ranger profile →

pick projectsend if

  • You want the projectsend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and projectsend fits your workflow better

full projectsend profile →

About ranger

Ranger is a console file manager with VI key bindings, written in Python and released under the GNU General Public License version 3, for terminal users who want to browse, preview, and manipulate files without leaving a Unix shell.

read the full ranger overview →

About projectsend

ProjectSend is a self hosted, GPLv2 licensed PHP and MySQL application that lets you share files with clients from your own server, with each client signing in to a private page, and it is aimed at freelancers, agencies and teams who would rather not hand client documents to a third party service.

read the full projectsend overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 94K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

ranger vs LocalSend ranger vs rclone ranger vs copyparty ranger vs Files ranger vs yazi ranger vs Spacedrive ranger vs Nextcloud ranger vs uppy ranger vs cloudreve ranger vs superfile ranger vs Seafile ranger vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is ranger or projectsend more popular?

ranger has 17,418 GitHub stars and projectsend has 2,027. ranger has the larger community by that measure.

Are ranger and projectsend free?

Both are open source. ranger is licensed under GPL-3.0 and projectsend under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ranger and projectsend?

ranger is written in Python and projectsend in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ranger or projectsend?

Choose ranger if you want the larger community (17,418 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose projectsend if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.