head to head · open source

postgrest vs ihp

postgrest has 27,674 GitHub stars, 1,227 forks, 400 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ihp has 5,348 stars, 226 forks, 283 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. postgrest leads on adoption by 417% (27,674 vs 5,348 stars). postgrest is written in Haskell under MIT; ihp is written in Haskell under MIT. postgrest has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, ihp 4%. postgrest was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (haskell, postgresql), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

postgrest ★ 28K ihp ★ 5.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

postgrest ihp
GitHub stars ★ 28K ★ 5.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in Haskell Haskell
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 226
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick postgrest if

  • You weight community size — 28K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Haskell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full postgrest profile →

pick ihp if

  • You want the ihp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Haskell
  • You evaluated both and ihp fits your workflow better

full ihp profile →

About postgrest

PostgREST is a Haskell written server that serves a fully RESTful API from any existing PostgreSQL database, and it is aimed at developers, database administrators, and operators who want a standards compliant HTTP API without writing and maintaining one from scratch.

read the full postgrest overview →

About ihp

IHP is a batteries included, type safe web framework built on Haskell and Nix that ships routing, views, models, validation, authentication, and deployment tooling in one monorepo, aimed at teams that want to build serious web applications in a compiled language without assembling their own stack.

read the full ihp overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

supabase vs postgrest supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

postgrest vs mall postgrest vs Prometheus postgrest vs NocoDB postgrest vs etcd postgrest vs DBeaver postgrest vs orm postgrest vs Milvus postgrest vs TiDB postgrest vs drawDB postgrest vs typeorm postgrest vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager postgrest vs Qdrant

Frequently asked questions

Is postgrest or ihp more popular?

postgrest has 27,674 GitHub stars and ihp has 5,348. postgrest has the larger community by that measure.

Are postgrest and ihp free?

Both are open source. postgrest is licensed under MIT and ihp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between postgrest and ihp?

postgrest is written in Haskell and ihp in Haskell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, postgrest or ihp?

Choose postgrest if you want the larger community (27,674 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ihp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.