head to head · open source

portainer vs terravision

portainer has 38,616 GitHub stars, 2,912 forks, 757 open issues and last shipped yesterday. terravision has 1,640 stars, 176 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. portainer leads on adoption by 2,255% (38,616 vs 1,640 stars). portainer is written in TypeScript under Zlib; terravision is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. portainer has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, terravision 11%. terravision was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

portainer ★ 39K terravision ★ 1.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

portainer terravision
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 1.6K
License Zlib AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 176
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick portainer if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full portainer profile →

pick terravision if

  • You want the terravision feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and terravision fits your workflow better

full terravision profile →

About portainer

Portainer Community Edition is a free, lightweight container management UI for Docker, Swarm, Podman, Kubernetes, and ACI environments, distributed under the zlib licence and aimed at homelab operators, hobbyists, students, and anyone experimenting with containers on their own hardware.

read the full portainer overview →

About terravision

TerraVision is a free, open source cloud architecture diagram generator for AWS, Azure and Google Cloud that works in both directions — from an AI prompt or Terraform code to a diagram, and from a diagram to Terraform — for cloud architects, platform engineers and infrastructure as code practitioners.

read the full terravision overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs portainer coolify vs portainer kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

portainer vs kubernetes portainer vs Docker portainer vs kong portainer vs trivy portainer vs OpenTofu portainer vs jenkins portainer vs floci portainer vs Pulumi portainer vs argo-cd portainer vs sops portainer vs wtf portainer vs dagger

Frequently asked questions

Is portainer or terravision more popular?

portainer has 38,616 GitHub stars and terravision has 1,640. portainer has the larger community by that measure.

Are portainer and terravision free?

Both are open source. portainer is licensed under Zlib and terravision under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between portainer and terravision?

portainer is written in TypeScript and terravision in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, portainer or terravision?

Choose portainer if you want the larger community (38,616 stars) or its Zlib licence terms. Choose terravision if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.