head to head · open source

portainer vs laravel-backup

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars, 2,906 forks, 757 open issues and last shipped yesterday. laravel-backup has 6,025 stars, 784 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. portainer leads on adoption by 539% (38,524 vs 6,025 stars). portainer is written in TypeScript under Zlib; laravel-backup is written in PHP under MIT. portainer has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, laravel-backup 13%. portainer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

portainer ★ 39K laravel-backup ★ 6.0K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

portainer laravel-backup
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 6.0K
License Zlib MIT
Written in TypeScript PHP
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 784
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick portainer if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full portainer profile →

pick laravel-backup if

  • You want the laravel-backup feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and laravel-backup fits your workflow better

full laravel-backup profile →

About portainer

Portainer Community Edition is a free, lightweight container management UI for Docker, Swarm, Podman, Kubernetes, and ACI environments, distributed under the zlib licence and aimed at homelab operators, hobbyists, students, and anyone experimenting with containers on their own hardware.

read the full portainer overview →

About laravel-backup

laravel backup is an MIT licensed PHP package from Spatie that packages a Laravel application's files and its database dump into a single zip archive and stores that archive on any filesystem Laravel is configured to use, and it is aimed at Laravel developers and operations teams who want automated, verifiable, self hosted backups without a separate backup service.

read the full laravel-backup overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kong vs portainer portainer vs trivy portainer vs opentofu kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

portainer vs kubernetes portainer vs kong portainer vs trivy portainer vs OpenTofu portainer vs jenkins portainer vs Pulumi portainer vs floci portainer vs argo-cd portainer vs sops portainer vs wtf portainer vs dagger portainer vs task

Frequently asked questions

Is portainer or laravel-backup more popular?

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars and laravel-backup has 6,025. portainer has the larger community by that measure.

Are portainer and laravel-backup free?

Both are open source. portainer is licensed under Zlib and laravel-backup under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between portainer and laravel-backup?

portainer is written in TypeScript and laravel-backup in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, portainer or laravel-backup?

Choose portainer if you want the larger community (38,524 stars) or its Zlib licence terms. Choose laravel-backup if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.