head to head · open source

portainer vs infracost

portainer has 38,523 GitHub stars, 2,907 forks, 757 open issues and last shipped yesterday. infracost has 12,521 stars, 688 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. portainer leads on adoption by 208% (38,523 vs 12,521 stars). portainer is written in TypeScript under Zlib; infracost is written in Go under Apache-2.0. portainer has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, infracost 5%. portainer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

portainer ★ 39K infracost ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

portainer infracost
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 13K
License Zlib Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 688
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick portainer if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full portainer profile →

pick infracost if

  • You want the infracost feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and infracost fits your workflow better

full infracost profile →

About portainer

Portainer Community Edition is a free, lightweight container management UI for Docker, Swarm, Podman, Kubernetes, and ACI environments, distributed under the zlib licence and aimed at homelab operators, hobbyists, students, and anyone experimenting with containers on their own hardware.

read the full portainer overview →

About infracost

Infracost is an open source cloud cost intelligence tool, written in Go and licensed Apache 2.0, that estimates cloud spend and enforces FinOps policies for Terraform, Terragrunt, CloudFormation and AWS CDK before changes are deployed — built for engineers, platform and DevOps teams, FinOps practitioners, and AI coding agents.

read the full infracost overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

portainer vs kong portainer vs trivy portainer vs OpenTofu portainer vs jenkins portainer vs Pulumi portainer vs floci portainer vs argo-cd portainer vs sops portainer vs wtf portainer vs dagger portainer vs task portainer vs aws-cdk

Frequently asked questions

Is portainer or infracost more popular?

portainer has 38,523 GitHub stars and infracost has 12,521. portainer has the larger community by that measure.

Are portainer and infracost free?

Both are open source. portainer is licensed under Zlib and infracost under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between portainer and infracost?

portainer is written in TypeScript and infracost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, portainer or infracost?

Choose portainer if you want the larger community (38,523 stars) or its Zlib licence terms. Choose infracost if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.