head to head · open source

portainer vs gocd

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars, 2,906 forks, 757 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gocd has 7,434 stars, 980 forks, 83 open issues and last shipped yesterday. portainer leads on adoption by 418% (38,524 vs 7,434 stars). portainer is written in TypeScript under Zlib; gocd is written in Java under Apache-2.0. portainer has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, gocd 13%. portainer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

portainer ★ 39K gocd ★ 7.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

portainer gocd
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 7.4K
License Zlib Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 980
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick portainer if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full portainer profile →

pick gocd if

  • You want the gocd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and gocd fits your workflow better

full gocd profile →

About portainer

Portainer Community Edition is a free, lightweight container management UI for Docker, Swarm, Podman, Kubernetes, and ACI environments, distributed under the zlib licence and aimed at homelab operators, hobbyists, students, and anyone experimenting with containers on their own hardware.

read the full portainer overview →

About gocd

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server, licensed under Apache 2.0 and sponsored by Thoughtworks, Inc., that automates and streamlines the build test release cycle for teams that want to model, run, and control their own delivery pipelines.

read the full gocd overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kong vs portainer portainer vs trivy portainer vs opentofu kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

portainer vs kubernetes portainer vs kong portainer vs trivy portainer vs OpenTofu portainer vs jenkins portainer vs Pulumi portainer vs floci portainer vs argo-cd portainer vs sops portainer vs wtf portainer vs dagger portainer vs task

Frequently asked questions

Is portainer or gocd more popular?

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars and gocd has 7,434. portainer has the larger community by that measure.

Are portainer and gocd free?

Both are open source. portainer is licensed under Zlib and gocd under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between portainer and gocd?

portainer is written in TypeScript and gocd in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, portainer or gocd?

Choose portainer if you want the larger community (38,524 stars) or its Zlib licence terms. Choose gocd if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.