head to head · open source

portainer vs chef

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars, 2,906 forks, 757 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chef has 8,241 stars, 2,520 forks, 411 open issues and last shipped yesterday. portainer leads on adoption by 367% (38,524 vs 8,241 stars). portainer is written in TypeScript under Zlib; chef is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. portainer has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, chef 31%. portainer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

portainer ★ 39K chef ★ 8.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

portainer chef
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 8.2K
License Zlib Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Ruby
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 2.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick portainer if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full portainer profile →

pick chef if

  • You want the chef feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and chef fits your workflow better

full chef profile →

About portainer

Portainer Community Edition is a free, lightweight container management UI for Docker, Swarm, Podman, Kubernetes, and ACI environments, distributed under the zlib licence and aimed at homelab operators, hobbyists, students, and anyone experimenting with containers on their own hardware.

read the full portainer overview →

About chef

Chef Infra configuration management tool for automating infrastructure configuration, deployment, and management across any environment, at any scale, for DevOps engineers and infrastructure teams.

read the full chef overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kong vs portainer portainer vs trivy portainer vs opentofu kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

portainer vs kubernetes portainer vs kong portainer vs trivy portainer vs OpenTofu portainer vs jenkins portainer vs Pulumi portainer vs floci portainer vs argo-cd portainer vs sops portainer vs wtf portainer vs dagger portainer vs task

Frequently asked questions

Is portainer or chef more popular?

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars and chef has 8,241. portainer has the larger community by that measure.

Are portainer and chef free?

Both are open source. portainer is licensed under Zlib and chef under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between portainer and chef?

portainer is written in TypeScript and chef in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, portainer or chef?

Choose portainer if you want the larger community (38,524 stars) or its Zlib licence terms. Choose chef if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.