head to head · open source

portainer vs cds

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars, 2,906 forks, 757 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cds has 4,843 stars, 453 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped yesterday. portainer leads on adoption by 695% (38,524 vs 4,843 stars). portainer is written in TypeScript under Zlib; cds is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. portainer has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, cds 9%. cds was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

portainer ★ 39K cds ★ 4.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

portainer cds
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 4.8K
License Zlib BSD-3-Clause
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 453
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick portainer if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full portainer profile →

pick cds if

  • You want the cds feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cds fits your workflow better

full cds profile →

About portainer

Portainer Community Edition is a free, lightweight container management UI for Docker, Swarm, Podman, Kubernetes, and ACI environments, distributed under the zlib licence and aimed at homelab operators, hobbyists, students, and anyone experimenting with containers on their own hardware.

read the full portainer overview →

About cds

CDS is an open source, enterprise grade continuous delivery and DevOps automation platform written in Go, for teams that build, run and own their own CI/CD workflows and want to script and scale them without depending on a hosted vendor.

read the full cds overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kong vs portainer portainer vs trivy portainer vs opentofu kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

portainer vs kubernetes portainer vs kong portainer vs trivy portainer vs OpenTofu portainer vs jenkins portainer vs Pulumi portainer vs floci portainer vs argo-cd portainer vs sops portainer vs wtf portainer vs dagger portainer vs task

Frequently asked questions

Is portainer or cds more popular?

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars and cds has 4,843. portainer has the larger community by that measure.

Are portainer and cds free?

Both are open source. portainer is licensed under Zlib and cds under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between portainer and cds?

portainer is written in TypeScript and cds in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, portainer or cds?

Choose portainer if you want the larger community (38,524 stars) or its Zlib licence terms. Choose cds if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.