head to head · open source

portainer vs bunkerweb

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars, 2,906 forks, 757 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bunkerweb has 10,976 stars, 642 forks, 170 open issues and last shipped yesterday. portainer leads on adoption by 251% (38,524 vs 10,976 stars). portainer is written in TypeScript under Zlib; bunkerweb is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. portainer has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, bunkerweb 6%. bunkerweb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, kubernetes), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

portainer ★ 39K bunkerweb ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

portainer bunkerweb
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 11K
License Zlib AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 642
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick portainer if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full portainer profile →

pick bunkerweb if

  • You want the bunkerweb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and bunkerweb fits your workflow better

full bunkerweb profile →

About portainer

Portainer Community Edition is a free, lightweight container management UI for Docker, Swarm, Podman, Kubernetes, and ACI environments, distributed under the zlib licence and aimed at homelab operators, hobbyists, students, and anyone experimenting with containers on their own hardware.

read the full portainer overview →

About bunkerweb

BunkerWeb is a next generation, open source, cloud native Web Application Firewall built as a full featured web server on top of NGINX, designed to make web services secure by default, and it is aimed at teams running web services on Linux, Docker, Swarm, or Kubernetes who want protection in place as a reverse proxy rather than assembled by hand.

read the full bunkerweb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kong vs portainer portainer vs trivy portainer vs opentofu kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

portainer vs kubernetes portainer vs kong portainer vs trivy portainer vs OpenTofu portainer vs jenkins portainer vs Pulumi portainer vs floci portainer vs argo-cd portainer vs sops portainer vs wtf portainer vs dagger portainer vs task

Frequently asked questions

Is portainer or bunkerweb more popular?

portainer has 38,524 GitHub stars and bunkerweb has 10,976. portainer has the larger community by that measure.

Are portainer and bunkerweb free?

Both are open source. portainer is licensed under Zlib and bunkerweb under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between portainer and bunkerweb?

portainer is written in TypeScript and bunkerweb in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, portainer or bunkerweb?

Choose portainer if you want the larger community (38,524 stars) or its Zlib licence terms. Choose bunkerweb if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.