head to head · open source

PocketBase vs web-maker

PocketBase has 61,123 GitHub stars, 3,695 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. web-maker has 2,698 stars, 324 forks, 120 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. PocketBase leads on adoption by 2,165% (61,123 vs 2,698 stars). PocketBase is written in Go under MIT; web-maker is written in JavaScript under MIT. PocketBase has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, web-maker 12%. PocketBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PocketBase ★ 61K web-maker ★ 2.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PocketBase web-maker
GitHub stars ★ 61K ★ 2.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-08-03
Forks ⑂ 3.7K ⑂ 324
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PocketBase if

  • You weight community size — 61K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PocketBase profile →

pick web-maker if

  • You want the web-maker feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and web-maker fits your workflow better

full web-maker profile →

About PocketBase

PocketBase is an open source backend framework written in Go that bundles a SQLite database, authentication, file storage, admin dashboard, and REST API into a single executable file. It lives in the Go ecosystem and targets developers who want a lightweight, self contained backend without managing separate services like PostgreSQL, Redis, or a separate auth server.

read the full PocketBase overview →

About web-maker

Web Maker is an MIT licensed, offline frontend code editor and playground for HTML, CSS and JavaScript experiments that runs entirely on the user's own system, and it is aimed at frontend developers who want CodePen style quick prototyping without a network connection.

read the full web-maker overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 265K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

PocketBase vs ECC PocketBase vs react PocketBase vs Langflow PocketBase vs Supabase PocketBase vs puppeteer PocketBase vs archify PocketBase vs i-have-adhd PocketBase vs codebase-memory-mcp PocketBase vs ToolJet PocketBase vs AppSmith PocketBase vs it-tools PocketBase vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is PocketBase or web-maker more popular?

PocketBase has 61,123 GitHub stars and web-maker has 2,698. PocketBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are PocketBase and web-maker free?

Both are open source. PocketBase is licensed under MIT and web-maker under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PocketBase and web-maker?

PocketBase is written in Go and web-maker in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PocketBase or web-maker?

Choose PocketBase if you want the larger community (61,123 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose web-maker if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.