head to head · open source

Plunk vs Sessy

Plunk has 5,474 GitHub stars, 401 forks, 61 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Sessy has 929 stars, 44 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Plunk leads on adoption by 489% (5,474 vs 929 stars). Plunk is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Sessy is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence. Plunk has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Sessy 5%. Sessy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Plunk ★ 5.5K Sessy ★ 929 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Plunk Sessy
GitHub stars ★ 5.5K ★ 929
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript Ruby
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 401 ⑂ 44
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Plunk if

  • You weight community size — 5.5K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Plunk profile →

pick Sessy if

  • You want the Sessy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and Sessy fits your workflow better

full Sessy profile →

About Plunk

Plunk is an open source email platform written in TypeScript and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It combines transactional email, marketing campaigns, and workflow automation in a single system, and it is positioned as a self hosted alternative to SendGrid, Resend, and Mailgun. The project lives in the TypeScript and Node.js ecosystem, ships as a Docker image, and is documented at docs.useplunk.com with a community Discord for support.

read the full Plunk overview →

About Sessy

Sessy is an open source email observability tool for Amazon SES, built in Ruby on Rails by Marc Köhlbrugge and distributed under the O'Saasy License. It lives in the AWS ecosystem: you keep sending through raw SES, and Sessy supplies the interface that shows what happened to each message after it left your application. The repository carries the topics amazon ses, email, rails, and ruby, and the project's own homepage is sessy.do.

read the full Sessy overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ntfy vs plunk ntfy vs inboxzero ntfy vs usesend ntfy vs freescout ntfy vs keila ntfy vs sendportal ntfy vs uninbox ntfy vs doublezero n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Email & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Email & Communication field.

Plunk vs Ntfy Plunk vs Inbox Zero Plunk vs useSend Plunk vs Freescout Plunk vs Keila Plunk vs Sendportal Plunk vs UnInbox Plunk vs DoubleZero Plunk vs Hyvor Relay Plunk vs Twake Mail Plunk vs AgentMail

Frequently asked questions

Is Plunk or Sessy more popular?

Plunk has 5,474 GitHub stars and Sessy has 929. Plunk has the larger community by that measure.

Are Plunk and Sessy free?

Both are open source. Plunk is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Sessy has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Plunk and Sessy?

Plunk is written in TypeScript and Sessy in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Plunk or Sessy?

Choose Plunk if you want the larger community (5,474 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Sessy if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.