head to head · open source

Ntfy vs Plunk

Ntfy has 34,282 GitHub stars, 1,605 forks, 393 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Plunk has 5,474 stars, 401 forks, 61 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Ntfy leads on adoption by 526% (34,282 vs 5,474 stars). Ntfy is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Plunk is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Ntfy has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Plunk 7%. Ntfy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ntfy ★ 34K Plunk ★ 5.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ntfy Plunk
GitHub stars ★ 34K ★ 5.5K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 401
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ntfy if

  • You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ntfy profile →

pick Plunk if

  • You want the Plunk feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Plunk fits your workflow better

full Plunk profile →

About Ntfy

ntfy is an HTTP based publish subscribe notification service that delivers push notifications to phones and desktops via simple REST API calls. It operates in the open source notification ecosystem, providing a lightweight alternative to proprietary push notification infrastructure. Users publish messages to topics via standard HTTP methods, and subscribers receive them instantly on registered devices.

read the full Ntfy overview →

About Plunk

Plunk is an open source email platform written in TypeScript and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It combines transactional email, marketing campaigns, and workflow automation in a single system, and it is positioned as a self hosted alternative to SendGrid, Resend, and Mailgun. The project lives in the TypeScript and Node.js ecosystem, ships as a Docker image, and is documented at docs.useplunk.com with a community Discord for support.

read the full Plunk overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ntfy vs inboxzero ntfy vs usesend ntfy vs freescout ntfy vs keila ntfy vs sendportal ntfy vs uninbox ntfy vs doublezero n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole

More Email & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Email & Communication field.

Ntfy vs Inbox Zero Ntfy vs useSend Ntfy vs Freescout Ntfy vs Keila Ntfy vs Sendportal Ntfy vs UnInbox Ntfy vs DoubleZero Ntfy vs Sessy Ntfy vs Hyvor Relay Ntfy vs Twake Mail Ntfy vs AgentMail

Frequently asked questions

Is Ntfy or Plunk more popular?

Ntfy has 34,282 GitHub stars and Plunk has 5,474. Ntfy has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ntfy and Plunk free?

Both are open source. Ntfy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Plunk under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ntfy and Plunk?

Ntfy is written in Go and Plunk in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ntfy or Plunk?

Choose Ntfy if you want the larger community (34,282 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Plunk if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.