head to head · open source

Plunk vs Sendportal

Plunk has 5,474 GitHub stars, 401 forks, 61 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Sendportal has 2,173 stars, 465 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 2.4 years ago. Plunk leads on adoption by 152% (5,474 vs 2,173 stars). Plunk is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Sendportal is written in PHP under MIT. Plunk has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Sendportal 21%. Plunk was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Plunk ★ 5.5K Sendportal ★ 2.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Plunk Sendportal
GitHub stars ★ 5.5K ★ 2.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript PHP
Last push 2026-09-14 2024-04-19
Forks ⑂ 401 ⑂ 465
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Plunk if

  • You weight community size — 5.5K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Plunk profile →

pick Sendportal if

  • You want the Sendportal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You evaluated both and Sendportal fits your workflow better

full Sendportal profile →

About Plunk

Plunk is an open source email platform written in TypeScript and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It combines transactional email, marketing campaigns, and workflow automation in a single system, and it is positioned as a self hosted alternative to SendGrid, Resend, and Mailgun. The project lives in the TypeScript and Node.js ecosystem, ships as a Docker image, and is documented at docs.useplunk.com with a community Discord for support.

read the full Plunk overview →

About Sendportal

SendPortal is an open source, self hosted email marketing application built in PHP and Laravel. It lives in the PHP and Laravel ecosystem and is distributed under the MIT license. Its core functionality is packaged as SendPortal Core, while the SendPortal application wraps that core with user authentication and multiple workspaces.

read the full Sendportal overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ntfy vs plunk ntfy vs sendportal ntfy vs inboxzero ntfy vs usesend ntfy vs freescout ntfy vs keila ntfy vs uninbox ntfy vs doublezero n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Email & Communication projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Email & Communication field.

Plunk vs Ntfy Plunk vs Inbox Zero Plunk vs useSend Plunk vs Freescout Plunk vs Keila Plunk vs UnInbox Plunk vs DoubleZero Plunk vs Sessy Plunk vs Hyvor Relay Plunk vs Twake Mail Plunk vs AgentMail

Frequently asked questions

Is Plunk or Sendportal more popular?

Plunk has 5,474 GitHub stars and Sendportal has 2,173. Plunk has the larger community by that measure.

Are Plunk and Sendportal free?

Both are open source. Plunk is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Sendportal under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Plunk and Sendportal?

Plunk is written in TypeScript and Sendportal in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Plunk or Sendportal?

Choose Plunk if you want the larger community (5,474 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Sendportal if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.