head to head · open source

i-have-adhd vs plandex

i-have-adhd has 52,899 GitHub stars, 3,046 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. plandex has 15,687 stars, 1,178 forks, 66 open issues and last shipped 1.0 years ago. i-have-adhd leads on adoption by 237% (52,899 vs 15,687 stars). i-have-adhd is written in Python under MIT; plandex is written in Go under MIT. i-have-adhd has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, plandex 8%. i-have-adhd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

i-have-adhd ★ 53K plandex ★ 16K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

i-have-adhd plandex
GitHub stars ★ 53K ★ 16K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2025-10-03
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick i-have-adhd if

  • You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full i-have-adhd profile →

pick plandex if

  • You want the plandex feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and plandex fits your workflow better

full plandex profile →

About i-have-adhd

i have adhd is a skill for coding agents, distributed as a Claude Code plugin, that stops the assistant from burying the answer inside preamble, recap, and closers.

read the full i-have-adhd overview →

About plandex

Plandex is an open source, terminal based AI coding agent for developers who need to plan and execute large coding tasks spanning dozens of files in real world projects.

read the full plandex overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 271K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 211K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 112K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

i-have-adhd vs ECC i-have-adhd vs react i-have-adhd vs Langflow i-have-adhd vs Supabase i-have-adhd vs puppeteer i-have-adhd vs archify i-have-adhd vs PocketBase i-have-adhd vs codebase-memory-mcp i-have-adhd vs herdr i-have-adhd vs ToolJet i-have-adhd vs AppSmith i-have-adhd vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is i-have-adhd or plandex more popular?

i-have-adhd has 52,899 GitHub stars and plandex has 15,687. i-have-adhd has the larger community by that measure.

Are i-have-adhd and plandex free?

Both are open source. i-have-adhd is licensed under MIT and plandex under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between i-have-adhd and plandex?

i-have-adhd is written in Python and plandex in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, i-have-adhd or plandex?

Choose i-have-adhd if you want the larger community (52,899 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose plandex if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.