head to head · open source

page-agent vs katana

page-agent has 29,217 GitHub stars, 2,626 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. katana has 17,579 stars, 1,188 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. page-agent leads on adoption by 66% (29,217 vs 17,579 stars). page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; katana is written in Go under MIT. page-agent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, katana 7%. katana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

page-agent ★ 29K katana ★ 18K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

page-agent katana
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 18K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick page-agent if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full page-agent profile →

pick katana if

  • You want the katana feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and katana fits your workflow better

full katana profile →

About page-agent

Page Agent is an MIT licensed TypeScript library from Alibaba that embeds a natural language GUI agent directly inside a web page, aimed at product teams, accessibility engineers, and automation developers who want to drive their own interfaces with plain language instructions instead of hand written scripts.

read the full page-agent overview →

About katana

Katana is an open source, MIT licensed crawling and spidering framework written in Go, built for security engineers and automation pipelines that need to map web applications at scale rather than explore them by hand.

read the full katana overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 84K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

page-agent vs Browser Use page-agent vs Crawl4AI page-agent vs Scrapling page-agent vs scrapy page-agent vs EasySpider page-agent vs Lightpanda page-agent vs changedetection.io page-agent vs CloakBrowser page-agent vs lux page-agent vs Scrapegraph-ai page-agent vs ArchiveBox page-agent vs crawlee

Frequently asked questions

Is page-agent or katana more popular?

page-agent has 29,217 GitHub stars and katana has 17,579. page-agent has the larger community by that measure.

Are page-agent and katana free?

Both are open source. page-agent is licensed under MIT and katana under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between page-agent and katana?

page-agent is written in TypeScript and katana in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, page-agent or katana?

Choose page-agent if you want the larger community (29,217 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose katana if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.