head to head · open source

page-agent vs katana

page-agent has 29,667 GitHub stars, 2,639 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. katana has 17,828 stars, 1,224 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. page-agent leads on adoption by 66% (29,667 vs 17,828 stars). page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; katana is written in Go under MIT. page-agent has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, katana 7%. katana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

page-agent ★ 30K katana ★ 18K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

page-agent katana
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 18K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-11-09 2026-11-09
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick page-agent if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full page-agent profile →

pick katana if

  • You want the katana feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and katana fits your workflow better

full katana profile →

About page-agent

Page Agent The GUI Agent Living in Your Webpage. One script gives any web page its own AI agent. 🌐 English 中文 🚀 Demo 📖 Docs 📢 HN Discussion 𝕏 Follow on X ✨ Features 🎯 Easy integration No need for browser extension / python / headless browser . Just in page javascript. Everything happens in your web page. 📖 Text based DOM manipulation No screenshots. No multi modal LLMs or special permissions needed. 🧠 Bring your own LLMs Works with most mainstream models, including locally deployed ones. See supported models. 🐙 Optional chrome extension for multi page tasks. And an MCP Server (Beta) to control it from…

read the full page-agent overview →

About katana

A next generation crawling and spidering framework Features • Installation • Usage • Scope • Config • Filters • Join Discord Features Fast And fully configurable web crawling Standard and Headless mode JavaScript parsing / crawling Customizable automatic form filling Scope control Preconfigured field / Regex Knowledge base ML page type / form classification (auto downloaded model) Customizable output Preconfigured fields INPUT STDIN , URL and LIST OUTPUT STDOUT , FILE and JSON Installation katana requires Go 1.26+ to install successfully. If you encounter any installation issues, we recommend trying with the…

read the full katana overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is page-agent or katana more popular?

page-agent has 29,667 GitHub stars and katana has 17,828. page-agent has the larger community by that measure.

Are page-agent and katana free?

Both are open source. page-agent is licensed under MIT and katana under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between page-agent and katana?

page-agent is written in TypeScript and katana in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, page-agent or katana?

Choose page-agent if you want the larger community (29,667 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose katana if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.