head to head · open source

lux vs page-agent

lux has 31,696 GitHub stars, 3,313 forks, 545 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. page-agent has 29,140 stars, 2,616 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. lux leads on adoption by 9% (31,696 vs 29,140 stars). lux is written in Go under MIT; page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. lux has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, page-agent 9%. page-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

lux ★ 32K page-agent ★ 29K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

lux page-agent
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 29K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-03-29 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 2.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick lux if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full lux profile →

pick page-agent if

  • You want the page-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and page-agent fits your workflow better

full page-agent profile →

About lux

Lux is a video download library and command line tool written in Go, released under the MIT license. It ships as a single lux binary that takes one or more URLs and retrieves the underlying media streams, and it also exposes the downloading logic as a Go library that other programs can embed. The project has existed for roughly nine years and lives in the Go ecosystem, distributed through go install alongside the usual operating system package managers.

read the full lux overview →

About page-agent

Page Agent is an MIT licensed TypeScript library from Alibaba that embeds a natural language GUI agent directly inside a web page, aimed at product teams, accessibility engineers, and automation developers who want to drive their own interfaces with plain language instructions instead of hand written scripts.

read the full page-agent overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 83K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

lux vs Browser Use lux vs Crawl4AI lux vs Scrapling lux vs scrapy lux vs EasySpider lux vs Lightpanda lux vs changedetection.io lux vs CloakBrowser lux vs Scrapegraph-ai lux vs ArchiveBox lux vs crawlee lux vs colly

Frequently asked questions

Is lux or page-agent more popular?

lux has 31,696 GitHub stars and page-agent has 29,140. lux has the larger community by that measure.

Are lux and page-agent free?

Both are open source. lux is licensed under MIT and page-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between lux and page-agent?

lux is written in Go and page-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, lux or page-agent?

Choose lux if you want the larger community (31,696 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose page-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.