head to head · open source
Lightpanda vs page-agent
Lightpanda has 41,313 GitHub stars, 2,039 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. page-agent has 29,634 stars, 2,642 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Lightpanda leads on adoption by 39% (41,313 vs 29,634 stars). Lightpanda is written in Zig under AGPL-3.0; page-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT. Lightpanda has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, page-agent 9%. Lightpanda was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Lightpanda | page-agent | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 41K | ★ 30K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Zig | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.0K | ⑂ 2.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Lightpanda if
- You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Zig
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick page-agent if
- You want the page-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and page-agent fits your workflow better
About Lightpanda
Lightpanda Browser The headless browser built from scratch for AI agents and automation. Not a Chromium fork. Not a WebKit patch. A new browser, written in Zig.   Benchmarks Requesting 933 real web pages over the network on a AWS EC2 m5.large instance. See benchmark details. Quick start Install Package Managers Latest nightly from Homebrew: Latest nightly from Arch Linux User Repository: Download from the nightly builds You can download the last binary from the nightly builds for Linux and MacOS for both x86 64 and aarch64. For Linux Verify the binary before running anything: Linux aarch64 is also available…
read the full Lightpanda overview →
About page-agent
Page Agent The GUI Agent Living in Your Webpage. One script gives any web page its own AI agent. 🌐 English 中文 🚀 Demo 📖 Docs 📢 HN Discussion 𝕏 Follow on X ✨ Features 🎯 Easy integration No need for browser extension / python / headless browser . Just in page javascript. Everything happens in your web page. 📖 Text based DOM manipulation No screenshots. No multi modal LLMs or special permissions needed. 🧠 Bring your own LLMs Works with most mainstream models, including locally deployed ones. See supported models. 🐙 Optional chrome extension for multi page tasks. And an MCP Server (Beta) to control it from…
read the full page-agent overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Lightpanda or page-agent more popular?
Lightpanda has 41,313 GitHub stars and page-agent has 29,634. Lightpanda has the larger community by that measure.
Are Lightpanda and page-agent free?
Both are open source. Lightpanda is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and page-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Lightpanda and page-agent?
Lightpanda is written in Zig and page-agent in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Lightpanda or page-agent?
Choose Lightpanda if you want the larger community (41,313 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose page-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.