head to head · open source

paca vs nimbalyst

paca has 1,836 GitHub stars, 154 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. nimbalyst has 1,751 stars, 254 forks, 642 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. paca leads on adoption by 5% (1,836 vs 1,751 stars). paca is written in Go under Apache-2.0; nimbalyst is written in TypeScript under MIT. paca has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, nimbalyst 15%. nimbalyst was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

paca ★ 1.8K nimbalyst ★ 1.8K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

paca nimbalyst
GitHub stars ★ 1.8K ★ 1.8K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 154 ⑂ 254
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick paca if

  • You weight community size — 1.8K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full paca profile →

pick nimbalyst if

  • You want the nimbalyst feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and nimbalyst fits your workflow better

full nimbalyst profile →

About paca

Paca is a free, open source, self hosted, AI native project management platform in which human Scrum teams and AI agents work as equal teammates on the same board, the same sprints, and the same goals.

read the full paca overview →

About nimbalyst

Nimbalyst is an open source visual workspace for Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other coding agents. It lives in the agentic coding ecosystem and brings sessions, worktrees, tasks, docs, diagrams, mockups, commits, and code into one desktop application. It is written in TypeScript, uses Electron, and is MIT licensed.

read the full nimbalyst overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

paca vs vibe-kanban paca vs Wekan paca vs qinglong paca vs edict paca vs OpenProject paca vs onedev paca vs Planka paca vs Leantime paca vs kanboard paca vs Kaneo paca vs ccpm paca vs Fizzy

Frequently asked questions

Is paca or nimbalyst more popular?

paca has 1,836 GitHub stars and nimbalyst has 1,751. paca has the larger community by that measure.

Are paca and nimbalyst free?

Both are open source. paca is licensed under Apache-2.0 and nimbalyst under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between paca and nimbalyst?

paca is written in Go and nimbalyst in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, paca or nimbalyst?

Choose paca if you want the larger community (1,836 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose nimbalyst if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.