head to head · open source

orm vs TimescaleDb

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars, 2,538 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. TimescaleDb has 23,548 stars, 1,154 forks, 389 open issues and last shipped yesterday. orm leads on adoption by 102% (47,640 vs 23,548 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; TimescaleDb is written in C under a custom or non-standard licence. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, TimescaleDb 5%. TimescaleDb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (database, postgres), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K TimescaleDb ★ 24K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm TimescaleDb
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 24K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick TimescaleDb if

  • You want the TimescaleDb feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and TimescaleDb fits your workflow better

full TimescaleDb profile →

About orm

Prisma ORM is a next generation TypeScript ORM for Node.js and TypeScript applications, supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB, and CockroachDB, and it is aimed at developers and teams building data backed applications in that ecosystem.

read the full orm overview →

About TimescaleDb

TimescaleDB is a time series database built on top of PostgreSQL and packaged as a PostgreSQL extension. It lives in the PostgreSQL ecosystem, and it uses SQL and PostgreSQL clients such as psql and pgAdmin. The project targets high performance real time analytics on time series and event data, with repository topics for IoT, financial analysis, and historian workloads.

read the full TimescaleDb overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

orm vs mall orm vs Prometheus orm vs NocoDB orm vs etcd orm vs DBeaver orm vs Milvus orm vs TiDB orm vs drawDB orm vs typeorm orm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager orm vs Qdrant orm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or TimescaleDb more popular?

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars and TimescaleDb has 23,548. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and TimescaleDb free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0, and TimescaleDb has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between orm and TimescaleDb?

orm is written in TypeScript and TimescaleDb in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or TimescaleDb?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,640 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose TimescaleDb if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.