head to head · open source

orm vs redka

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars, 2,538 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. redka has 4,566 stars, 135 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. orm leads on adoption by 943% (47,640 vs 4,566 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; redka is written in Go under BSD-3-Clause. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, redka 3%. orm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (database, postgres), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K redka ★ 4.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm redka
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 4.6K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-02-04
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 135
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick redka if

  • You want the redka feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and redka fits your workflow better

full redka profile →

About orm

Prisma ORM is a next generation TypeScript ORM for Node.js and TypeScript applications, supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB, and CockroachDB, and it is aimed at developers and teams building data backed applications in that ecosystem.

read the full orm overview →

About redka

Redka reimplements the core parts of Redis in SQL while staying compatible with the Redis API, aimed at Go developers and teams who want Redis style data structures without running a separate Redis server or holding all data in RAM.

read the full redka overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

orm vs mall orm vs Prometheus orm vs NocoDB orm vs etcd orm vs DBeaver orm vs Milvus orm vs TiDB orm vs drawDB orm vs typeorm orm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager orm vs Qdrant orm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or redka more popular?

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars and redka has 4,566. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and redka free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and redka under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between orm and redka?

orm is written in TypeScript and redka in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or redka?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,640 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose redka if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.