head to head · open source

orm vs efcore

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars, 2,538 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. efcore has 14,793 stars, 3,419 forks, 2,343 open issues and last shipped today. orm leads on adoption by 222% (47,640 vs 14,793 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; efcore is written in C# under MIT. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, efcore 23%. efcore was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (database, orm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K efcore ★ 15K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm efcore
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 15K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 3.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick efcore if

  • You want the efcore feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and efcore fits your workflow better

full efcore profile →

About orm

Prisma ORM is a next generation TypeScript ORM for Node.js and TypeScript applications, supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB, and CockroachDB, and it is aimed at developers and teams building data backed applications in that ecosystem.

read the full orm overview →

About efcore

EF Core is a modern object database mapper for .NET, maintained by Microsoft under the MIT License as a .NET Foundation project, and it is intended for .NET developers who want to work with relational and non relational databases through LINQ queries, change tracking, updates, and schema migrations instead of hand written data access code.

read the full efcore overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

orm vs mall orm vs Prometheus orm vs NocoDB orm vs etcd orm vs DBeaver orm vs Milvus orm vs TiDB orm vs drawDB orm vs typeorm orm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager orm vs Qdrant orm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or efcore more popular?

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars and efcore has 14,793. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and efcore free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and efcore under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between orm and efcore?

orm is written in TypeScript and efcore in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or efcore?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,640 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose efcore if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.