head to head · open source

orm vs dbtpl

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars, 2,538 forks, 2,627 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. dbtpl has 3,896 stars, 337 forks, 70 open issues and last shipped 12 days ago. orm leads on adoption by 1,123% (47,640 vs 3,896 stars). orm is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; dbtpl is written in Go under MIT. orm has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, dbtpl 9%. orm was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (mysql, orm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

orm ★ 48K dbtpl ★ 3.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

orm dbtpl
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 3.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-08
Forks ⑂ 2.5K ⑂ 337
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick orm if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full orm profile →

pick dbtpl if

  • You want the dbtpl feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and dbtpl fits your workflow better

full dbtpl profile →

About orm

Prisma ORM is a next generation TypeScript ORM for Node.js and TypeScript applications, supporting PostgreSQL, MySQL, MariaDB, SQL Server, SQLite, MongoDB, and CockroachDB, and it is aimed at developers and teams building data backed applications in that ecosystem.

read the full orm overview →

About dbtpl

dbtpl is an MIT licensed command line tool that inspects a SQL database schema or a custom SQL query and generates idiomatic Go code from the results, built for Go developers who want typed models and query code without hand writing the repetitive parts.

read the full dbtpl overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs orm supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

orm vs mall orm vs Prometheus orm vs NocoDB orm vs etcd orm vs DBeaver orm vs Milvus orm vs TiDB orm vs drawDB orm vs typeorm orm vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager orm vs Qdrant orm vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is orm or dbtpl more popular?

orm has 47,640 GitHub stars and dbtpl has 3,896. orm has the larger community by that measure.

Are orm and dbtpl free?

Both are open source. orm is licensed under Apache-2.0 and dbtpl under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between orm and dbtpl?

orm is written in TypeScript and dbtpl in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, orm or dbtpl?

Choose orm if you want the larger community (47,640 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose dbtpl if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.