head to head · open source

Orca vs Pullfrog

Orca has 71,017 GitHub stars, 4,642 forks, 5,801 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Pullfrog has 1,195 stars, 75 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Orca leads on adoption by 5,843% (71,017 vs 1,195 stars). Orca is written in TypeScript under MIT; Pullfrog is written in TypeScript under MIT. Orca has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Pullfrog 6%. Orca was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Orca ★ 71K Pullfrog ★ 1.2K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Orca Pullfrog
GitHub stars ★ 71K ★ 1.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.6K ⑂ 75
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Orca if

  • You weight community size — 71K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Orca profile →

pick Pullfrog if

  • You want the Pullfrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Pullfrog fits your workflow better

full Pullfrog profile →

About Orca

Orca is an agent desktop environment (ADE) that runs multiple AI coding agents in parallel, each in its own isolated git worktree. It unifies workflow, monitoring, and collaboration around AI assisted coding across desktop, mobile, and remote runtimes. Built for developers who rely on several AI coding tools simultaneously, Orca eliminates context switching by tracking all agents and their outputs in one place.

read the full Orca overview →

About Pullfrog

Pullfrog is an open source, model agnostic BYOK GitHub bot that runs AI agent workflows natively inside GitHub Actions, and it is built for developers and teams who want automated PR review, CI autofix, and issue triage without handing their repository, keys, or cost model to a hosted vendor.

read the full Pullfrog overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

opencode vs orca opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

Orca vs OpenCode Orca vs pi Orca vs OpenHands Orca vs Paperclip Orca vs Cline Orca vs Aider Orca vs Continue Orca vs Tabby Orca vs Grok Build Orca vs T3 Code Orca vs Dyad Orca vs SWE-agent

Frequently asked questions

Is Orca or Pullfrog more popular?

Orca has 71,017 GitHub stars and Pullfrog has 1,195. Orca has the larger community by that measure.

Are Orca and Pullfrog free?

Both are open source. Orca is licensed under MIT and Pullfrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Orca and Pullfrog?

Orca is written in TypeScript and Pullfrog in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Orca or Pullfrog?

Choose Orca if you want the larger community (71,017 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pullfrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.