head to head · open source

OpenWispr vs Jarvis

OpenWispr has 8,315 GitHub stars, 1,023 forks, 341 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Jarvis has 634 stars, 108 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. OpenWispr leads on adoption by 1,212% (8,315 vs 634 stars). OpenWispr is written in JavaScript under MIT; Jarvis is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenWispr has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Jarvis 17%. OpenWispr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenWispr ★ 8.3K Jarvis ★ 634 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenWispr Jarvis
GitHub stars ★ 8.3K ★ 634
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-21
Forks ⑂ 1.0K ⑂ 108
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenWispr if

  • You weight community size — 8.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenWispr profile →

pick Jarvis if

  • You want the Jarvis feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Jarvis fits your workflow better

full Jarvis profile →

About OpenWispr

OpenWhispr is a free, MIT licensed, open source voice to text desktop application for macOS, Windows, and Linux that turns speech into text, notes, and actions at the cursor, and it is built for anyone who wants dictation and meeting transcription without sending audio to a third party.

read the full OpenWispr overview →

About Jarvis

Jarvis is a free, MIT licensed, open source voice dictation and voice control assistant for the Mac, built for anyone who wants hold a key dictation and local, private AI processing without a subscription.

read the full Jarvis overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

handy vs openwispr handy vs jarvis fluidvoice vs openwispr handy vs fluidvoice handy vs amical handy vs voicetypr fluidvoice vs amical fluidvoice vs voicetypr n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Input & Dictation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Input & Dictation field.

OpenWispr vs Handy OpenWispr vs FluidVoice OpenWispr vs Amical OpenWispr vs VoiceTypr

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenWispr or Jarvis more popular?

OpenWispr has 8,315 GitHub stars and Jarvis has 634. OpenWispr has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenWispr and Jarvis free?

Both are open source. OpenWispr is licensed under MIT and Jarvis under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenWispr and Jarvis?

OpenWispr is written in JavaScript and Jarvis in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenWispr or Jarvis?

Choose OpenWispr if you want the larger community (8,315 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Jarvis if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.