head to head · open source

FluidVoice vs Amical

FluidVoice has 11,611 GitHub stars, 828 forks, 89 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Amical has 1,531 stars, 141 forks, 58 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. FluidVoice leads on adoption by 658% (11,611 vs 1,531 stars). FluidVoice is written in Swift under GPL-3.0; Amical is written in TypeScript under MIT. FluidVoice has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Amical 9%. FluidVoice was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai, dictation, macos), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

FluidVoice ★ 12K Amical ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

FluidVoice Amical
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 1.5K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Swift TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 828 ⑂ 141
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick FluidVoice if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full FluidVoice profile →

pick Amical if

  • You want the Amical feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Amical fits your workflow better

full Amical profile →

About FluidVoice

FluidVoice is an open source voice dictation app for macOS under GPL 3.0. It uses on device speech recognition and a local AI enhancement layer to turn spoken input into text inside other applications. The project lives in the macOS and Swift ecosystem, with Homebrew installation, menu bar integration, and accessibility based text insertion.

read the full FluidVoice overview →

About Amical

Amical is an open source, local first AI dictation and note taking app for desktop use. It lives in the Electron, TypeScript, Whisper, and Ollama ecosystem, and it is positioned as an input and productivity tool for people who want to speak instead of typing. The project is MIT licensed and written in TypeScript.

read the full Amical overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

handy vs fluidvoice handy vs amical fluidvoice vs openwispr fluidvoice vs voicetypr handy vs openwispr handy vs voicetypr handy vs jarvis n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole

More Input & Dictation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Input & Dictation field.

FluidVoice vs Handy FluidVoice vs OpenWispr FluidVoice vs VoiceTypr FluidVoice vs Jarvis

Frequently asked questions

Is FluidVoice or Amical more popular?

FluidVoice has 11,611 GitHub stars and Amical has 1,531. FluidVoice has the larger community by that measure.

Are FluidVoice and Amical free?

Both are open source. FluidVoice is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Amical under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between FluidVoice and Amical?

FluidVoice is written in Swift and Amical in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, FluidVoice or Amical?

Choose FluidVoice if you want the larger community (11,611 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Amical if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.