head to head · open source
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor vs OpenWebAnalytics
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. OpenWebAnalytics has 2,697 stars, 488 forks, 115 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor leads on adoption by 226% (8,789 vs 2,697 stars). Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT; OpenWebAnalytics is written in PHP under GPL-2.0. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, OpenWebAnalytics 18%. OpenWebAnalytics was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor | OpenWebAnalytics | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.8K | ★ 2.7K |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-07-05 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 464 | ⑂ 488 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if
- You weight community size — 8.8K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick OpenWebAnalytics if
- You want the OpenWebAnalytics feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and OpenWebAnalytics fits your workflow better
About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…
read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →
About OpenWebAnalytics
Open Web Analytics Server Open Web Analytics is an open source alternative to commercial web analytics tools such as Google Analytics. This software allows you to stay in control of the data you collect about the user of your websites or applications. This repository installs the OWA Server and Javascript tracking client which can easily be added to web pages. To add OWA tracking to a WordPress based website install the OWA integration plugin or see this repository. To add OWA tracking to any PHP application use the OWA PHP SDK Features Track visitors, pageviews, e commerce transactions, and configurable actions…
read the full OpenWebAnalytics overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or OpenWebAnalytics more popular?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 GitHub stars and OpenWebAnalytics has 2,697. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has the larger community by that measure.
Are Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and OpenWebAnalytics free?
Both are open source. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT and OpenWebAnalytics under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor and OpenWebAnalytics?
Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python and OpenWebAnalytics in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor or OpenWebAnalytics?
Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if you want the larger community (8,789 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OpenWebAnalytics if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.