head to head · open source

OpenTofu vs karpor

OpenTofu has 30,204 GitHub stars, 1,367 forks, 320 open issues and last shipped yesterday. karpor has 1,730 stars, 113 forks, 93 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. OpenTofu leads on adoption by 1,646% (30,204 vs 1,730 stars). OpenTofu is written in Go under MPL-2.0; karpor is written in Go under Apache-2.0. OpenTofu has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, karpor 7%. OpenTofu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenTofu ★ 30K karpor ★ 1.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenTofu karpor
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 1.7K
License MPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-07-12
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 113
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenTofu if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenTofu profile →

pick karpor if

  • You want the karpor feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and karpor fits your workflow better

full karpor profile →

About OpenTofu

OpenTofu is an open source infrastructure as code (IaC) tool that enables users to define and manage cloud and on premises infrastructure using declarative configuration files. It lives in the cloud infrastructure management ecosystem and serves as a community driven fork of Terraform, maintaining compatibility with Terraform’s configuration language and provider ecosystem while operating under the MPL 2.0 license.

read the full OpenTofu overview →

About karpor

Karpor is an open source Kubernetes visualization tool written in Go and licensed under Apache 2.0. It lives in the cloud native Kubernetes ecosystem and presents itself as a vendor neutral, developer friendly, community driven project for developer and platform engineering teams.

read the full karpor overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs opentofu trivy vs opentofu kong vs trivy kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

OpenTofu vs kong OpenTofu vs trivy OpenTofu vs jenkins OpenTofu vs Pulumi OpenTofu vs floci OpenTofu vs argo-cd OpenTofu vs sops OpenTofu vs wtf OpenTofu vs dagger OpenTofu vs task OpenTofu vs aws-cdk OpenTofu vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenTofu or karpor more popular?

OpenTofu has 30,204 GitHub stars and karpor has 1,730. OpenTofu has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenTofu and karpor free?

Both are open source. OpenTofu is licensed under MPL-2.0 and karpor under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenTofu and karpor?

OpenTofu is written in Go and karpor in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenTofu or karpor?

Choose OpenTofu if you want the larger community (30,204 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose karpor if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.