head to head · open source

OpenTofu vs infracost

OpenTofu has 30,204 GitHub stars, 1,367 forks, 320 open issues and last shipped yesterday. infracost has 12,521 stars, 688 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. OpenTofu leads on adoption by 141% (30,204 vs 12,521 stars). OpenTofu is written in Go under MPL-2.0; infracost is written in Go under Apache-2.0. OpenTofu has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, infracost 5%. OpenTofu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenTofu ★ 30K infracost ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenTofu infracost
GitHub stars ★ 30K ★ 13K
License MPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 688
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenTofu if

  • You weight community size — 30K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenTofu profile →

pick infracost if

  • You want the infracost feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and infracost fits your workflow better

full infracost profile →

About OpenTofu

OpenTofu is an open source infrastructure as code (IaC) tool that enables users to define and manage cloud and on premises infrastructure using declarative configuration files. It lives in the cloud infrastructure management ecosystem and serves as a community driven fork of Terraform, maintaining compatibility with Terraform’s configuration language and provider ecosystem while operating under the MPL 2.0 license.

read the full OpenTofu overview →

About infracost

Infracost is an open source cloud cost intelligence tool, written in Go and licensed Apache 2.0, that estimates cloud spend and enforces FinOps policies for Terraform, Terragrunt, CloudFormation and AWS CDK before changes are deployed — built for engineers, platform and DevOps teams, FinOps practitioners, and AI coding agents.

read the full infracost overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs opentofu trivy vs opentofu kong vs trivy kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

OpenTofu vs kong OpenTofu vs trivy OpenTofu vs jenkins OpenTofu vs Pulumi OpenTofu vs floci OpenTofu vs argo-cd OpenTofu vs sops OpenTofu vs wtf OpenTofu vs dagger OpenTofu vs task OpenTofu vs aws-cdk OpenTofu vs webhook

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenTofu or infracost more popular?

OpenTofu has 30,204 GitHub stars and infracost has 12,521. OpenTofu has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenTofu and infracost free?

Both are open source. OpenTofu is licensed under MPL-2.0 and infracost under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenTofu and infracost?

OpenTofu is written in Go and infracost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenTofu or infracost?

Choose OpenTofu if you want the larger community (30,204 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose infracost if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.