head to head · open source

OpenSearch vs Quickwit

OpenSearch has 13,726 GitHub stars, 2,958 forks, 3,167 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Quickwit has 11,651 stars, 597 forks, 815 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenSearch leads on adoption by 18% (13,726 vs 11,651 stars). OpenSearch is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Quickwit is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. OpenSearch has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, Quickwit 5%. Quickwit was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (search-engine), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenSearch ★ 14K Quickwit ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenSearch Quickwit
GitHub stars ★ 14K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 597
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenSearch if

  • You weight community size — 14K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenSearch profile →

pick Quickwit if

  • You want the Quickwit feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Quickwit fits your workflow better

full Quickwit profile →

About OpenSearch

OpenSearch is an open source, distributed, and RESTful search engine, described in its README as an enterprise grade search and observability suite. It lives in the open source search and analytics ecosystem, is written in Java, and is licensed under Apache 2.0. The project states that it includes certain Apache licensed Elasticsearch code from Elasticsearch B.V., and that OpenSearch is a registered trademark of LF Projects, LLC.

read the full OpenSearch overview →

About Quickwit

Quickwit is an open source search engine written in Rust under the Apache 2.0 license. It is positioned for observability workloads, especially log management and distributed tracing, and it names metrics support as a roadmap item. The project lives in the cloud native search engine ecosystem and is designed to search data stored in object storage.

read the full Quickwit overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

elasticsearch vs opensearch elasticsearch vs quickwit elasticsearch vs meilisearch elasticsearch vs searxng elasticsearch vs typesense meilisearch vs searxng elasticsearch vs manticore meilisearch vs typesense uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Search Engines projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Search Engines field.

OpenSearch vs Elasticsearch OpenSearch vs Meilisearch OpenSearch vs SearXNG OpenSearch vs Typesense OpenSearch vs Manticore Search OpenSearch vs SeekStorm

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenSearch or Quickwit more popular?

OpenSearch has 13,726 GitHub stars and Quickwit has 11,651. OpenSearch has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenSearch and Quickwit free?

Both are open source. OpenSearch is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Quickwit under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenSearch and Quickwit?

OpenSearch is written in Java and Quickwit in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenSearch or Quickwit?

Choose OpenSearch if you want the larger community (13,726 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Quickwit if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.