head to head · open source

OpenObserve vs transmittable-thread-local

OpenObserve has 22,803 GitHub stars, 1,179 forks, 598 open issues and last shipped today. transmittable-thread-local has 8,306 stars, 1,720 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. OpenObserve leads on adoption by 175% (22,803 vs 8,306 stars). OpenObserve is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; transmittable-thread-local is written in Java under Apache-2.0. OpenObserve has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, transmittable-thread-local 21%. OpenObserve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (apm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenObserve ★ 23K transmittable-thread-local ★ 8.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenObserve transmittable-thread-local
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 8.3K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-11-05 2026-06-18
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenObserve if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenObserve profile →

pick transmittable-thread-local if

  • You want the transmittable-thread-local feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and transmittable-thread-local fits your workflow better

full transmittable-thread-local profile →

About OpenObserve

Open source Datadog alternative for logs, metrics, traces, and frontend monitoring. Modern observability platform: 10x easier, 140x lower storage cost, high performance, petabyte scale. Cloud · Documentation · Slack · Quickstart OpenObserve (O2) is a cloud native observability platform for logs, metrics, traces, analytics, Real User Monitoring (RUM), and AI/LLM observability. It's a cost effective alternative to Datadog, Splunk, and Elasticsearch for teams that need full observability without the complexity or cost — with Parquet columnar storage and an S3 native design that cuts storage costs by up to 140x…

read the full OpenObserve overview →

About transmittable-thread-local

[!IMPORTANT] 🚧 这个分支是 TransmittableThreadLocal(TTL) v3 ,在开发中还没有发布。 v3 的版本说明、工作项列表及其进展,参见 issue 432。 👉 目前使用中的稳定发布版本 v2.x 在 分支 2.x 上。 📖 English Documentation 📖 中文文档 🔧 功能 🎨 需求场景 👥 User Guide 1. 简单使用 2. 保证线程池中传递值 2.1 修饰 Runnable 和 Callable 整个过程的完整时序图 2.2 修饰线程池 2.3 使用 Java Agent 来修饰 JDK 线程池实现类 Java Agent 的启动参数配置 🔌 Java API Docs 🍪 Maven依赖 🔨 关于编译构建 ❓ FAQ ✨ 使用 TTL 的好处与必要性 🗿 更多文档 📚 相关资料 JDK Core Classes 💗 Who Used 👷 Contributors 🔧 功能 👉 TransmittableThreadLocal ( TTL ):在使用线程池等会池化复用线程的执行组件情况下,提供 ThreadLocal 值的传递功能,解决异步执行时上下文传递的问题。一个 Java 标准库本应为框架/中间件设施开发提供的标配能力,本库功能聚焦 & 0依赖,支持 Java 6 21 。 JDK 的…

read the full transmittable-thread-local overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenObserve or transmittable-thread-local more popular?

OpenObserve has 22,803 GitHub stars and transmittable-thread-local has 8,306. OpenObserve has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenObserve and transmittable-thread-local free?

Both are open source. OpenObserve is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and transmittable-thread-local under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenObserve and transmittable-thread-local?

OpenObserve is written in TypeScript and transmittable-thread-local in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenObserve or transmittable-thread-local?

Choose OpenObserve if you want the larger community (22,803 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose transmittable-thread-local if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.