head to head · open source

OpenObserve vs transmittable-thread-local

OpenObserve has 22,027 GitHub stars, 1,098 forks, 598 open issues and last shipped today. transmittable-thread-local has 8,308 stars, 1,723 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. OpenObserve leads on adoption by 165% (22,027 vs 8,308 stars). OpenObserve is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; transmittable-thread-local is written in Java under Apache-2.0. OpenObserve has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, transmittable-thread-local 21%. OpenObserve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (apm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenObserve ★ 22K transmittable-thread-local ★ 8.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenObserve transmittable-thread-local
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 8.3K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Java
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-06-18
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenObserve if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenObserve profile →

pick transmittable-thread-local if

  • You want the transmittable-thread-local feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and transmittable-thread-local fits your workflow better

full transmittable-thread-local profile →

About OpenObserve

OpenObserve is an open source observability platform for logs, metrics, traces, analytics, Real User Monitoring, session replay, pipelines, SLO, and LLM observability. It lives in the cloud native infrastructure ecosystem and is described as an alternative to Datadog, Splunk, and Elasticsearch. The project is built in Rust, ships as a single binary, and uses Parquet columnar storage with an S3 native design.

read the full OpenObserve overview →

About transmittable-thread-local

TransmittableThreadLocal (TTL) is a small, zero dependency Java library from Alibaba that provides an enhanced InheritableThreadLocal capable of transmitting values between threads even when those threads are pooled and reused. It lives in the Java ecosystem and targets framework and middleware developers who need reliable context propagation across asynchronous execution boundaries. The library is Apache 2.0 licensed, roughly 1000 SLOC, and supports Java 6 through 21.

read the full transmittable-thread-local overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

OpenObserve vs Uptime Kuma OpenObserve vs worldmonitor OpenObserve vs NetData OpenObserve vs Grafana OpenObserve vs huginn OpenObserve vs Sentry OpenObserve vs SigNoz OpenObserve vs Grafana Loki OpenObserve vs beszel OpenObserve vs cilium OpenObserve vs Apache SkyWalking OpenObserve vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenObserve or transmittable-thread-local more popular?

OpenObserve has 22,027 GitHub stars and transmittable-thread-local has 8,308. OpenObserve has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenObserve and transmittable-thread-local free?

Both are open source. OpenObserve is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and transmittable-thread-local under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenObserve and transmittable-thread-local?

OpenObserve is written in TypeScript and transmittable-thread-local in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenObserve or transmittable-thread-local?

Choose OpenObserve if you want the larger community (22,027 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose transmittable-thread-local if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.