head to head · open source
OpenObserve vs phoenix_live_dashboard
OpenObserve has 22,803 GitHub stars, 1,179 forks, 598 open issues and last shipped yesterday. phoenix_live_dashboard has 2,176 stars, 206 forks, 17 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. OpenObserve leads on adoption by 948% (22,803 vs 2,176 stars). OpenObserve is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; phoenix_live_dashboard is written in Elixir under MIT. OpenObserve has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, phoenix_live_dashboard 9%. OpenObserve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (metrics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenObserve | phoenix_live_dashboard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 2.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Elixir |
| Last push | 2026-11-05 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 206 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenObserve if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick phoenix_live_dashboard if
- You want the phoenix_live_dashboard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Elixir
- You evaluated both and phoenix_live_dashboard fits your workflow better
About OpenObserve
Open source Datadog alternative for logs, metrics, traces, and frontend monitoring. Modern observability platform: 10x easier, 140x lower storage cost, high performance, petabyte scale. Cloud · Documentation · Slack · Quickstart OpenObserve (O2) is a cloud native observability platform for logs, metrics, traces, analytics, Real User Monitoring (RUM), and AI/LLM observability. It's a cost effective alternative to Datadog, Splunk, and Elasticsearch for teams that need full observability without the complexity or cost — with Parquet columnar storage and an S3 native design that cuts storage costs by up to 140x…
read the full OpenObserve overview →
About phoenix_live_dashboard
Phoenix LiveDashboard Online Documentation. LiveDashboard provides real time performance monitoring and debugging tools for Phoenix developers. It provides the following modules: Home See general information about the system OS Data See general information about OS, such as CPU, Memory and Disk usage Metrics See how your application performs under different conditions by visualizing :telemetry events with real time charts Request logging See everything that was logged for certain requests Applications See, filter, and search applications in the current node and view their processes in a supervision tree…
read the full phoenix_live_dashboard overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenObserve or phoenix_live_dashboard more popular?
OpenObserve has 22,803 GitHub stars and phoenix_live_dashboard has 2,176. OpenObserve has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenObserve and phoenix_live_dashboard free?
Both are open source. OpenObserve is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and phoenix_live_dashboard under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between OpenObserve and phoenix_live_dashboard?
OpenObserve is written in TypeScript and phoenix_live_dashboard in Elixir. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenObserve or phoenix_live_dashboard?
Choose OpenObserve if you want the larger community (22,803 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose phoenix_live_dashboard if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.