head to head · open source

OpenObserve vs graphite-web

OpenObserve has 22,777 GitHub stars, 1,179 forks, 598 open issues and last shipped yesterday. graphite-web has 6,132 stars, 1,255 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 23 days ago. OpenObserve leads on adoption by 271% (22,777 vs 6,132 stars). OpenObserve is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; graphite-web is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. OpenObserve has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, graphite-web 20%. OpenObserve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (metrics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenObserve ★ 23K graphite-web ★ 6.1K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenObserve graphite-web
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 6.1K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-10-13
Forks ⑂ 1.2K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenObserve if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenObserve profile →

pick graphite-web if

  • You want the graphite-web feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and graphite-web fits your workflow better

full graphite-web profile →

About OpenObserve

Open source Datadog alternative for logs, metrics, traces, and frontend monitoring. Modern observability platform: 10x easier, 140x lower storage cost, high performance, petabyte scale. Cloud · Documentation · Slack · Quickstart OpenObserve (O2) is a cloud native observability platform for logs, metrics, traces, analytics, Real User Monitoring (RUM), and AI/LLM observability. It's a cost effective alternative to Datadog, Splunk, and Elasticsearch for teams that need full observability without the complexity or cost — with Parquet columnar storage and an S3 native design that cuts storage costs by up to 140x…

read the full OpenObserve overview →

About graphite-web

Graphite Web Overview Graphite consists of three major components: 1. Graphite Web, a Django based web application that renders graphs and dashboards 2. The Carbon metric processing daemons 3. The Whisper time series database library Installation, Configuration and Usage Please refer to the instructions at readthedocs. License Graphite Web is licensed under version 2.0 of the Apache License. See the LICENSE file for details.

read the full graphite-web overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenObserve or graphite-web more popular?

OpenObserve has 22,777 GitHub stars and graphite-web has 6,132. OpenObserve has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenObserve and graphite-web free?

Both are open source. OpenObserve is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and graphite-web under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenObserve and graphite-web?

OpenObserve is written in TypeScript and graphite-web in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenObserve or graphite-web?

Choose OpenObserve if you want the larger community (22,777 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose graphite-web if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.